For Authors

Submission Guidelines

Authors submitting to AcademicProceeding.org under the Society of Integrated Academic Research and Education (SIARE) are required to ensure that their manuscripts meet established academic, ethical, and technical standards.

These guidelines provide a comprehensive framework for preparing and submitting manuscripts to SIARE Proceedings, ensuring a smooth editorial, peer-review, and publication process.

Applicable to all SIARE proceedings

Original Work

Manuscripts must be original, unpublished, and not under review elsewhere.

Extended Papers

Conference papers must demonstrate significant academic enhancement.

Ethical Compliance

Strict adherence to publication ethics and integrity policies.

Peer Review

All submissions undergo rigorous editorial and peer evaluation.

1. Eligibility of Submissions

Manuscripts submitted to SIARE Proceedings must represent high-quality, original research aligned with the scope of the respective conference or publication.

  • Original and unpublished work
  • Not submitted or under consideration elsewhere
  • Aligned with the conference or proceedings scope
  • Demonstrating academic rigor and technical quality

2. Extended Version Requirement

For conference-associated submissions, authors must submit a substantially extended version of the original paper.

  • Expanded methodology, analysis, or theoretical framework
  • Additional experiments, validation, or datasets
  • Enhanced discussion and interpretation of results
  • Updated and expanded literature review
Manuscripts must typically demonstrate at least 30-60% substantive enhancement. Submissions lacking meaningful extension may be rejected without review.

3. Manuscript Preparation

Manuscripts must be prepared in a clear, structured, and professional format.

  • Informative title, structured abstract, and relevant keywords
  • Logical organization (introduction, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion)
  • Consistent citation and referencing style
  • Clear, high-quality figures and tables with proper captions
  • Language must be precise, professional, and grammatically correct
Authors are strongly encouraged to use official templates to ensure consistency and compliance with formatting requirements.

4. Submission Process

Manuscripts must be submitted through the designated submission system or as instructed by the conference organizers.

  • Complete manuscript file in required format
  • Full author details and affiliations
  • Abstract and keywords
  • Supplementary materials (if applicable)

Upon successful submission, authors will receive confirmation along with a manuscript reference ID for tracking and communication.

5. Ethical Requirements

All submissions must comply with internationally recognized publication ethics standards.

  • No plagiarism, fabrication, or falsification of data
  • Proper authorship attribution and contribution disclosure
  • Conflict of interest declaration
  • Ethical approval for human or animal research (where applicable)

Authors should refer to the Publication Ethics Policy for detailed guidance.

6. Plagiarism and Similarity Check

All submissions are screened using plagiarism detection tools to ensure originality and academic integrity.

  • High similarity scores may result in rejection
  • Proper citation and paraphrasing are mandatory
  • Use of AI-generated content must comply with policy requirements
Authors must review and comply with the Plagiarism & AI Policy before submission.

7. Peer Review Process

All manuscripts undergo a structured peer-review process to ensure quality, validity, and academic integrity.

  • Review by independent subject experts
  • Evaluation of originality, methodology, and contribution
  • Revision required where necessary
  • Final decision by editorial board
Please refer to the Peer Review Process page of the respective conference or proceeding for detailed review model, timelines, and reviewer structure, as peer review policies may vary for each proceeding.

8. Acceptance Criteria

Manuscripts are assessed based on:

  • Originality and novelty
  • Scientific and technical rigor
  • Clarity and organization
  • Relevance to the field
  • Overall contribution to knowledge

9. Revision and Resubmission

Authors may be required to revise manuscripts based on reviewer feedback.

  • All reviewer comments must be addressed systematically
  • Changes should be clearly highlighted or documented
  • Resubmission must be within the specified timeline

10. Final Submission Requirements

Upon acceptance, authors must provide final publication-ready materials:

  • Final revised manuscript
  • Author declarations and confirmations
  • Copyright and licensing agreement
  • High-resolution figures and supplementary files

Contact

For submission-related queries and support: